The lands of the Old Idyll-Bulgarian State were under the significant effect of Kipchaks in the centuries of XIV-XV. Kipchak-Nogay groups settled in this region. We observe this incident from some tribal names such as Kongrat, Nun, Toksaba, Burkut, Kireyet, Alat, Karagay, Bodrak, Katay, Tabın, Balıkçı, Khirghiz, Kipçak, etc. and some cultural materials. The ethnical formations of Kazan Tatars, Misers and Kasim Tatars started to appear in the middle of the centuries XIV-XVI. Kazan Tatars achieved their own structure within the Kazan Khanate, one of the big states in the Eastern Europe in the middle of the centuries XV-XVI. Miser and Kasim Tatars gained their ethnical structures in the centuries of XV-XVII. In addition to this, Miser people experienced their formation process until the middle of the century XVI. Kasim Tatars was a transition group in ethnical aspect between the Kazan Tatars that constituted the social peak of Kasim Khanate and the Miser people. As a result of the mass migrations in the Idyll-Ural region in the second half of the century XVI-XVII., Kazan, Kasim Tatars and the Miser people got much closer and they constituted the base for the formation of a single Tatar nation, "Idyll-Ural Tatars". This fundamental structuring continued since the end of the century XVII until the beginning of the century XX. Astrahan Tatars was composed of Khazar and Kipchak groups much before than the groups of Golden Army. These people were within some Nogay groups just like Karagash people that were under the powerful influence of Noyah Orda in the centuries XV-XVII. Some of the Turkistan Turks joined to Astrahan Tatars. Probably, the ethnical groups of the same groups (Yurt Tatars and Karagash people), the Nogay and Altin Ordu Turks of the Middle Ages constituted the Astrahan Khanate (years 1459-1556) and the states of Nogay Orda and Astrahan Tatars.
Siberian Tatars were rooted from the ethnical groups of Nogay Kipchak people. Some tribal names such as Tabın, Katay, Tanayman, Kongrat (Kurdak), Kirayet, Karagay, Yılan, Tokuz, etc. can be observed among the Siberian Tatars. Additionally, there were some names such as Supra, İstyak, Bikatin, Uvat, Yurma, etc. These resembled to the names with Uighur roots. The development of Siberian Tatars was observed within the structure of Tümen Beyliği at the end of the century XVI. In the first decade of the century XVI, Tümen Beyliği was connected to the Siberian Khanate that survived until the year of 1598. In this period, it is supposed that the Siberian Tatars could not form a united nation in a proper manner.
In the Middle Ages, in other words in the period of Altin Ordu (Golden Army) and Khanates, there were commercial-economic and ethnical relations among Tatars that lived in different regions. Due to this reason, Tatar groups are much closer in respect of language and culture. However, pursuant to the invasion of Tatar Khanates by Russians in the century XVI, some Tatar groups staetedto live in different historical and cultural fields. This situation affected their ethnical developments. These three Tatar groups started to from a single nation due to the ethnical, cultural and demographic processes in the centuries XIX-XX, the domination of Russia, the close relation of the ethnical areas, the immigration of Idyll-Ural Tatars to Astrahan and Western Siberian regions. Thus, the ethnical characteristics, languages, cultures and lifestyles got closer. The adoption of the common name of "Tatar" is the indicator of this development. However, this process could not be completed even in the beginning of the century XX.
There was a classification as "from Bokhara" among the Siberian Tatars and "Nogays" among the Astrahan Tatars. These groups preferred to use their tribal names. Among the Idyll-Ural Tatars, only 88 % of the Tatar population in the European region of the country called themselves as "Tatar" in the cencus carried out in the year of 1926. The remaning 12% of the population that were composed of Miser people (241.000), Kreshin (113.000), Tipter people (25.000) did not adopt the name of Tatar. There were some reasons for the continuation of these local titles. But the most significant reason could be stated as the incompletion of the process of integration of Tatars. In the history, the ethnical processes could not develop and they have not been completed in some respects up to today. However, in general, Tatars is a great Turkish nation that nearly got integrated.
The End
Back to Menu